Question wording corrected: . Privacy and wording correction; source dates and documented figures are unchanged.

How to use this page: Amounts here are historical, dated and sometimes from draft reports. Different financial measures and jurisdictions must not be added together. We do not publish a pooled 'available housing money' total.

Put Context Beside Every Dollar

No pooled “available money” total. Keep the program, period, financial measure and limits attached to the amount.

Adopted reallocation

$1,500,000

Existing CDBG Funds Redirected to Housing

CDBG · Tucson · PY2026 / FY2027

October 6, 2026 Council action, Resolution 24188 and Exhibit A.

Existing funds moved between CDBG categories. This is not a new federal award.

Still unknown: Actual draws, implementation and spending remain unverified. HUD submission is also unverified.

Open CDBG Figure and Sources

Our sum of reported payments

$58,701,289

HCV Rental Assistance Paid

City-administered · Tucson + Pima County · FY2026

Paid to property owners and managers. FY2026: July 1, 2025–June 30, 2026. Source: October 20, 2026 PHA report, pp. 1–2.

Our calculation:
$49,539,339 (Tucson)
+ $9,161,950 (Pima County)
= $58,701,289 combined.

Still unknown: Matching receipts and carryover labels need reconciliation. Keep separate from FY2025 expenditures.

Open HCV Figure and Sources

Draft report figure

$527,244.29

HOME Program Income Carried Forward

HOME · Draft PY2025 CAPER · July 1, 2025–June 30, 2026

$534,792.63 received less $7,548.34 applied in the draft presentation.

Program income reported as carried forward. It is not a verified balance available to spend.

Still unknown: How much is committed or available to spend remains unknown. Restrictions also need verification.

Open HOME Figure and Sources

Reader rule: Reallocations, payments and carryforwards are different measures. Do not add these cards together or infer current household assistance.

A visual guide to existing published research, not a new financial review. Each record below retains its source dates, reporting period and verification limits.

Program-Specific Funding and Reporting

This is a curated selection from published research, not the full internal workbook. Each entry links to a previously published finding or evidence question and identifies what remains unverified.

Search scope: Search and topic filters apply only to the curated catalog entries below. They do not search the detailed question-led research below, the full site or source documents. Read the detailed funding and financing questions.

Showing 7 research records.

CDBG · PY2024 · City CAPER

CDBG — PY2024 Reported Resources and Spending

$5,418,132 current-resource subtotal

The published research cites $4,717,936 in CR-15 CDBG expenditures (rounded), a separate reporting measure. The $349,468 program-income component is already included in the resource subtotal and must not be added again.

Important limit: Resource totals and expenditure measures cannot be treated as an unobligated or currently available balance.

Source: SRC-023 · PY2024 CAPER CR-15

CDBG · PY2026 / FY2027 · October 2026

CDBG — Adopted Reallocation to Housing

$1,500,000 reallocated, not newly awarded

The October 6 Council action report, Resolution 24188 and Exhibit A document adoption of the $1.5 million transfer between CDBG categories, with no increase in total resources. The action report records a 7–0 vote.

Important limit: HUD submission/receipt, implementation, IDIS activity records and actual draws must still be verified. This is not an additional $1.5 million in federal revenue.

Original adopted-action records: SRC-102 · SRC-103 · SRC-104

HOME · PY2024 · City CAPER

HOME — PY2024 Resources and Expenditures

$3,148,083 resources / $479,243 expended

These rounded figures are reported in the project's historical research summary for the PY2024 CAPER. Matching activity commitments, draws and completion records are still needed.

Important limit: The difference is not proof of free cash, unobligated funds, or assistance available to applicants.

Source: SRC-023 · PY2024 CAPER

HOME · PY2025 draft CAPER

HOME — Program Income Carried Forward

$527,244.29 draft carryforward

The draft CAPER reports $534,792.63 received and $7,548.34 applied in its program-income presentation. The arithmetic produces a reported carryforward, not a cash availability test.

Important limit: Current commitments, draw dates, restrictions and usable balances have not been independently established.

Source: Draft PY2025 CAPER · F-009

HOME · PY2025 draft CAPER

HOME — Recaptured Funds Carried Forward

$307,564.13 draft carryforward

The draft separately reports $373,430.46 received and $65,866.33 applied in recaptured funds. These funds are distinct from HOME program income.

Important limit: No unrestricted rental subsidy or current household eligibility is established by this report.

Source: Draft PY2025 CAPER · F-009

ESG · PY2024 · grant-draw date differs

ESG — Rapid-Rehousing Performance

Target definition unresolved / 18 actual households reported

The original PY2024 Annual Action Plan describes the rapid-rehousing target as 30 individuals in its project narrative but 30 households in its goal table; another entry gives 10 households for combined rapid rehousing and prevention. The comparison with 18 reported actual households therefore needs a clarified target definition.

Important limit: The CAPER’s PR-91 shows the entire $48,734 rapid-rehousing budget drawn by September 23, 2025. That later grant-draw checkpoint does not explain the outcome count or establish cost per household.

Source: SRC-023 · SRC-115

HCV · FY2026 / PY2025 · Tucson and Pima scopes

Housing Choice Vouchers — Reported Funding Comparisons

$58,701,289 FY2026 owner/manager payments

The October 20 PHA report records $49,539,339 in Tucson and $9,161,950 in Pima County payments to property owners or managers for FY2026 (July 1, 2025–June 30, 2026), totaling $58,701,289. It reports $614,215 plus $306,275, totaling $920,490, as unaudited unspent assistance or next-year reserves, while its narrative calls the amount an operating surplus. Those labels still need reconciliation.

Important limit: The FY2025 Single Audit separately reports $62,789,037 in Housing Choice Voucher federal expenditures for July 1, 2024–June 30, 2025. Its accrual or modified-accrual measure is not FY2026 cash receipts. The near-match to the draft’s approximately $62.8 million narrative is a source-year question, not proof of an error. No usable-cash inference; reconcile matching periods and accounting categories.

Source: SRC-024 · SRC-106 · SRC-108

County Housing Funding and PRICE: Separate Measures

Research updated: .

FY2027 County Allocations

$8,700,000 approved

$5 million for gap funding plus $3.7 million for housing stability. A separate additional $1 million request was tabled indefinitely on September 8, 2026.

Approval does not establish spending or households served.

Meeting summary · Official action

County PRICE Agreement Scopes

$2,986,331 in approved scopes

$2,009,932 for home repairs plus $976,399 for eviction-prevention and legal services, for July 2026 through June 2029. These are existing-grant components, not additional revenue above the federal award.

Full execution, reimbursements and actual household outcomes remain unverified.

Repair packet · Eviction-prevention packet

City of Tucson Federal PRICE Award

$78,172.27 cumulative reported outlays

USAspending reports $11,519,567.21 in obligations for the City’s entire PRICE award. The latest outlay reporting period is August 2026.

Not County spending or a current available balance. Do not add cumulative monthly rows or add County components to the full award.

Federal record and reporting cutoff

Read the Full Source Review · Records Still Needed

What Funding Is Involved in the County’s Housing Report?

Published: . Source: November 5, 2026 County memo, pages 2–3.

The $207,436 home-repair line is listed under County CDBG agencies. CDBG is a federal HUD program, but the memo doesn’t identify the specific award. It separately lists $111,045 as the County-funded portion of Affordable Housing Fund repair and weatherization work.

Read the County Report Review and Its Reconciliation Limits.

Source: Pima County, One Pima Initiative: Fiscal Year 27 First Quarter Update, November 5, 2026, page 2; rapid-rehousing narrative, page 3.

Allocations, Financing and Remaining Questions

Selected questions updated November 7, 2026. Latest evidence review; earlier source dates and remaining limits are retained.

Resident privacy: Questions about assistance and outcomes seek aggregate counts, not residents’ identities or individual records. See our privacy standard.

Posted: . Source dates are identified below.

When housing funding is announced, what happens next? Each answer separates what the records show from what still needs checking. “Unknown” means not established by the records reviewed here. A project’s status may have changed since its source date.

Q-012 · added November 6, 2026

How Much Federal Funding Is Documented?

Documented: HUD’s FY2026 allocation file and Tucson’s FY2027/PY2026 Annual Action Plan agree on four allocations:

  • Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): $4,962,047 for eligible community-development work, including housing.
  • HOME: $3,061,840.81 for the Tucson/Pima County consortium.
  • ESG: $448,998 for Tucson’s Emergency Solutions Grant.
  • HOPWA: $1,140,597 for housing assistance and services for low-income people with HIV/AIDS and their families.

Together, the allocations total $9,613,482.81. The City separately forecasts $200,000 in CDBG income and $500,000 in HOME income. Each program has its own eligible uses and service area.

Unknown: How much has been received, committed or spent is not established by these allocations and forecasts.

Next: Match receipts and spending to completed activities and aggregate household counts for the same reporting period.

Source date: HUD FY2026 allocations; City plan May 2026, covering July 1, 2026–June 30, 2027. [1, 2]

Q-013 · added November 6, 2026

What Do the Two Craycroft Financing Records Mean?

Documented: The Arizona Finance Authority’s $10 million volume-cap allocation and the City’s bond authorization concern the same financing and must not be added as separate funding. Posted Resolution 24206 states adoption on November 4 of authorization for up to $10 million in bonds. The IDA’s October 15 action report records its earlier final approval. The November 4 legal action report confirms a separate 6–0 vote adopting Resolution 24206 under Consent Agenda Item J, with Cunningham absent/excused. Council action report, reviewed November 9.

Unknown: Bond closing, proceeds received and signed assistance contracts remain unverified. Blank tracker closing fields do not prove that no closing occurred.

Next: Obtain closing documents and use-of-proceeds records.

Source date: AFA tracker October 7, 2026; Council agenda November 4, 2026. [3, 4]

The separately documented $500,000 Pima County preservation award is distinct from these bond-financing records.

Updated . SRC-098 · SRC-107 · November 7 review

Q-014 · added November 6, 2026

How Much CoC Funding Was Requested?

Documented: TPCH submitted a $22,827,346 total FY2026 Continuum of Care request on September 29, 2026. It includes renewals and other categories, not just new funding. The submission is not a final HUD award. [12, 13]

Next: Compare final awards with the request. HUD’s November 3 notice says awards are required by December 1, 2026. [14]

Research Standards

Plans, awards, commitments, expenditures, restricted balances, completed housing, and actual vacancies are separate measures. Published figures have limited reporting periods and may rely on historical agency statements. Questions are not findings of fraud or noncompliance.

Detailed source records remain in the Public Evidence Index. Corrections and additional official records can be shared through Contact.