Public Evidence Index

Documented: HUD and the City plan agree on CDBG $4,962,047, HOME $3,061,840.81 for the Tucson/Pima consortium, ESG $448,998 and HOPWA $1,140,597, totaling $9,613,482.81. Forecast program income is separate: CDBG $200,000 and HOME $500,000. These are allocations and forecasts, not verified receipts or spending.

Unknown: How much has been received, committed or spent is not established by these allocations and forecasts.

Next: Match receipts and spending to completed activities and aggregate household counts for the same reporting period.

Documented: The Arizona Finance Authority’s $10 million volume-cap allocation and the City’s bond authorization concern the same financing and must not be added as separate funding. Posted Resolution 24206 states adoption on November 4 of authorization for up to $10 million in bonds. The IDA’s October 15 action report records its earlier final approval. The November 4 legal action report confirms a separate 6–0 vote adopting Resolution 24206 under Consent Agenda Item J, with Cunningham absent/excused. Council action report, reviewed November 9.

Unknown: Bond closing, proceeds received and signed assistance contracts remain unverified. Blank tracker closing fields do not prove that no closing occurred.

Next: Obtain closing documents and use-of-proceeds records.

Documented: TPCH submitted a $22,827,346 total FY2026 Continuum of Care request on September 29, 2026. It includes renewals and other categories, not just new funding. The submission is not a final HUD award. [12–13]

Next: Compare final awards with the request. HUD’s November 3 notice says awards are required by December 1, 2026. [14]

Documented: The plan is to rehabilitate 82 existing homes: 74 apartments and eight duplex units. El Pueblo Housing Development (EPHD) also describes a Rental Assistance Demonstration conversion, which changes their subsidy structure.

Federal records show an environmental milestone and a submitted financing plan for the 82-unit preservation project. The RAD tracker reviewed November 7 lists “Financing Plan Submitted” without a closing date. Closing, proceeds and signed assistance contracts remain unverified.

Unknown: Which budget and bedroom count govern? The November presentation lists 124 bedrooms in its summary and 85 in its detailed slide. The summary cost entry is $33.9, without a millions label; the detail gives $34.7 million.

Next: Confirm the governing budget and bedroom count, then document public contract status, aggregate occupancy totals and published application and referral rules.

Documented: The August 18 PHA packet supports the up-to-120 El Portal voucher plan; its attached amendment is a public-comment draft, and the local action was adopted as amended. The October 30 memo estimates 181 planned voucher units across two phases, not delivered new homes. Separately, the City’s October 1 newsletter reports 41 households placed in existing El Portal apartments over the summer with Housing First assistance. That report does not establish implementation of the planned voucher expansion.

Unknown: Final HUD approval, signed assistance contracts and dated totals of households receiving the new PBV assistance remain unverified. The October 20 PHA report anticipated related HUD approvals during October–December; that expectation is not approval. Final effective operating policies, completed inspections and rent determinations remain to be verified.

Next: Obtain aggregate counts of contracted units and households assisted, with reporting dates, inspection-completion totals and effective program policies. Do not request resident names, unit-level addresses or individual case records.

Documented: Housing First recorded 21 permanent-housing exits among 36 counted leavers (58.3%), after excluding eight of 44 leavers, and all 26 openings filled through Coordinated Entry for July 1, 2025–June 1, 2026. Separately, seven of 43 people in the June 1, 2024–June 1, 2025 permanent-housing exit cohort returned within 12 months (16.3%). These are different groups and periods; weighted scores are not housing-success percentages or evidence of underspending.

Unknown: The aggregate destination categories accounting for the eight excluded exits are not established. Later aggregate outcomes and costs for comparable groups and reporting periods also remain unverified.

Next: Obtain an agency-prepared aggregate breakdown by broad destination category and updated outcome totals, with inclusion rules, denominators and reporting periods. Combine or suppress small groups where individuals could be identified; do not request participant records.

Documented: The November EPHD presentation’s project-cost entries sum to 590.8; its printed total is 593.5. Several entries omit the millions label. Its 1,326-unit total includes projects at different stages and rehabilitation work.

Unknown: The cost unit and total need clarification. The unit total alone does not show how many new homes were completed.

Next: Obtain a corrected project table with explicit cost units and separate planned, existing, rehabilitated and completed homes.

Documented: The submitted FY2026 priority listing names Housing First PSH for partial reallocation: $4,706,481 in annual renewal funding, $3,485,762 retained and $1,220,719 available for new projects. The Board cites the amount available for renewals in Tier 1 and says the applicant was notified June 25. This is a submitted funding decision, not a final HUD award. [12, p. 17]

Next: Verify the final award and resulting service capacity. The separate roughly 50% case is identified as SAAF AVP-RRH in Q-020, not Housing First.

Documented: The submitted priority listing identifies SAAF AVP-RRH, grant AZ0268D9T012501, as the roughly 50% underspending-reallocation case: $792,695 from a $1,585,389 annual renewal amount, followed by reallocation of the balance because of limited Tier 1 renewal space. The separate payment-system-lockout case remains unidentified.

Unknown: The application passage itself names neither project; the priority listing supplies the AVP-RRH identification. It does not identify the retained-funding lockout case. Final HUD awards and implementation remain unverified.

Next: Obtain the underlying Board decisions and recipient notices, identify the retained-funding case, and verify final awards and implementation.