HousingSee the open question, the records needed to investigate it, and what those records could establish.
Original research snapshot: November 8, 2026. Later findings retain their own source dates.
These are 10 published questions and three Capital Fund evidence needs. This is not a log of submitted or received records requests. The answers remain unverified; missing evidence alone is not a finding of misuse. Each related record retains its own project and program scope.
13 entries
No entries match. Try a broader search or clear the filters.
Unit-level schedules are needed before combining designations from different funders at the same property.
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkAppropriately redacted schedules matching assisted-unit designations across funders and programs at the same property.
Whether designation counts overlap before any unique assisted-apartment count is reported.
Use executed restriction agreements, amendments and their start dates. Leave unverified end dates blank.
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkExecuted restriction agreements and amendments, with verified start dates and applicable terms.
Which affordability restrictions apply and when they end; an authorization alone does not establish expiry.
Match project-specific disbursement records to the funder, phase and period before calculating spending per apartment.
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkProject-specific disbursement records matched to the funder, program, phase and reporting period.
What was paid, before considering any spending-per-apartment calculation.
Keep both dated sources visible until a correction, executed agreement or closeout record explains the difference.
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkA correction, executed agreement or amendment, transaction explanation or closeout record connecting the conflicting dated statements.
Whether and how the statements can be reconciled; both sources remain visible until then.
City and State HOME schedules have not been matched unit by unit. HOME and ARPA set-asides are also not established as separate apartments.
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkAppropriately redacted City and State HOME unit schedules, and evidence connecting HOME and ARPA set-asides.
Whether the six City HOME units, five State HOME units and ARPA designations overlap. No resident identities should be published.
Executed affordability start dates, terms and expiry remain unknown. A dated authorization is not a verified end date.
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkExecuted affordability agreements and amendments, including verified restriction start dates and terms.
Applicable restriction periods and expiry, without carrying an older authorization term onto changed unit or income statements.
Current deed ownership and the parcel/legal description have not been verified.
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkCurrent deed records and the parcel or legal description for the development.
Current deed ownership and property identity. Program and City file identifiers are insufficient.
The 2023 authorization and 2025 report give different unit and income statements. An executed amendment has not been verified.
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkAn executed amendment or other explanatory record connecting the 2023 ARPA authorization to the 2025 performance statement.
Why the unit and income statements changed, and which executed terms apply.
City cash disbursements, loan balances, total development cost and a complete financing stack are not established.
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkCity disbursement and loan-balance records, a complete financing stack and evidence of total development cost.
Actual payments and financing measures, without relabeling HUD funding fields as independently verified cash disbursements.
The City draft CAPER is not a verified current occupancy record or an inspected certificate of occupancy.
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkA dated occupancy record or inspected certificate-of-occupancy evidence appropriate to the question.
What completion and current occupancy can be verified beyond the draft CAPER statement. This would not establish current vacancy availability.
Which uses and budget line items were approved for each grant?
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkHUD-approved grant Annual Statements/Budgets and the approved five-year plan.
Which uses and budget line items were approved for each grant.
What were Phoenix’s PHA obligations, draws and expenditures by grant and activity?
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkGrant-level Performance and Evaluation reports or LOCCS reports.
Phoenix PHA obligations, draws and expenditures by grant and activity; missing amounts remain unverified, not zero.
Which grant years and activities support the annual SEFA expenditure row?
Read the published question or evidence needDirect linkA grant-to-project and City-year reconciliation supported by grant and activity records.
Which grant years and activities support the annual SEFA expenditure row. A single award cannot be subtracted from it to infer a balance.
Download project, question and comparison relationships (JSON)
