Read the dated statements side by side, follow their sources, and see what evidence would explain the difference.
Original research snapshot: November 8, 2026. Later findings retain their own source dates.
A comparison keeps both statements visible.
A later report or file-update label does not by itself reconcile the records or replace an earlier statement. Dates below identify the kind of date each source supplies.
2 entries
No entries match. Try a broader search or clear the filters.
Prints all matching entries with connected evidence expanded. Save a PDF from the print dialog.
The authorization describes 11 units at or below 65% AMI for at least 20 years. The later report describes 16 units at or below 40% AMI with the same $896,564 allocation.
What remains unresolved
An executed amendment has not been verified. The older 20-year authorization term must not be carried onto the changed unit and income statement. Neither record establishes actual payment or a verified restriction expiry.
Evidence needed
An executed amendment or other explanatory record connecting the authorization to the performance statement.
Phoenix AZ001 · federal grant year 2026Direct link
Capital Fund: two published 2026 HUD amounts
Unresolved in the published research snapshot
Separate formula-calculation workbook
Formula effective-date cell April 1, 2026 · retrieved November 8, 2026
HUD’s separately published FY2026 formula workbook lists $2,813,904 for Phoenix (AZ001). Development-level portions are calculation inputs, not approved project budgets or project spending.
What this does not show Do not add the formula amount to the published award or treat development portions as project earmarks. Formula attribution and proposed uses answer different questions.
HUD index file-update label Updated September 28, 2026 · retrieved November 8, 2026
HUD’s current master ACC schedule lists a $2,842,753 Capital Fund award amount for Phoenix (AZ001), grant AZ20P00150126.
What this does not show Not cash draws, PHA contract obligations, actual expenditure or recognized accounting revenue. The public workbook is not an executed Phoenix agreement; Phoenix execution has not been verified.
The master ACC amount of $2,842,753 is $28,849 higher than the separate formula amount of $2,813,904. This is arithmetic between published sources, not a verified award-revision transaction.
What remains unresolved
The reviewed records do not establish the transaction, date or reason linking these amounts. A file-update label is not a Phoenix transaction date. The difference is not evidence of missing money or a cash receipt.
Evidence needed
An explanatory transaction or revision record linking the published amounts, alongside grant-level approval and reporting records.
