Housing
Accountability Project
Phoenix & Maricopa County

Housing Accountability Project · City research

Phoenix and Maricopa County

Follow housing funding, explore reported results, and see what the records still cannot tell us.

Original research snapshot · . Source periods vary.
Later publications · November 9 housing and funding update · November 10 housing counts and shelter funding

Start with a question.

About these records: scope, dates & reading notes

Geography: Phoenix projects and City records, with separately labeled Maricopa County funding opportunities. Other funders are named when relevant.

Original research snapshot: November 8, 2026.
Each record keeps its own reporting date.

No cross-city ranking. Measures below describe different stages and must not be added together.

Public Funding Deserves Public Understanding

Explore the project files

25th @ Bell · The Moreland

01 / What the records say

A few findings to start with.

Selected examples from this research. Each figure keeps its date, place and limits.

53 apartments reported completed

The draft FY2025–26 CAPER reports 25th @ Bell completed. This is draft reporting, not a current occupancy or vacancy check.

Read the finding

Two planned Moreland phases

The June 17, 2026 Council report describes 132 and 105 planned apartments. The combined 237 is not completed Phase I housing.

Read the finding

A closing is a financing record

Phoenix IDA reports a $43.1 million Moreland I closing in December 2025. It does not establish City spending or final development cost.

Read the finding

02 / Projects & funding

Start with one place.

A selected research set, not a complete city inventory or a housing availability list.

The Moreland

132 Phase I + 105 Phase II planned apartments

Planned phases · June 17, 2026 Council scope report

Explore The Moreland

Reported milestones do not establish current vacancies.

How do funding records differ?

Four records. Four different meanings.

These are separate measures, not a guaranteed sequence. Evidence of one does not establish the others.

  1. Approved

    Permission or a ceiling.

    What does this establish?

    An adopted action or authorization shows what is permitted. It does not prove that an agreement was executed or money was paid.

    Moreland II's assistance authorization
  2. Financing secured

    A financing event.

    What does this establish?

    A reported closing describes financing. Read the closing documents and the funder’s role before describing it as City spending.

    Moreland I's reported financing closing
  3. Money spent

    A dated payment or expenditure.

    What does this establish?

    Look for disbursement or expenditure records matched to the program, project and period. A reported program total may not identify a specific project.

    Why an annual Capital Fund expenditure row needs context
  4. Housing delivered

    A reported housing milestone.

    What does this establish?

    Read the completion or opening record with its date and evidence status. It does not by itself establish current occupancy or available vacancies.

    25th @ Bell's draft completion report

03 / What remains unknown

Good questions need the right records.

A gap in the reviewed evidence does not by itself establish misuse.

Which assisted apartments overlap?

Different programs can designate apartments at the same property. Match the schedules before counting unique homes.

Follow the question

What was actually paid?

Project-specific disbursements are needed before calculating spending per apartment.

Follow the question

How do differing records connect?

An executed amendment or explanatory transaction may be needed; a later date alone does not reconcile the statements.

Follow the question
See all research questions →

04 / Check the evidence

Go back to the original record.

Use the source index to find original documents and locators. Check the reporting period and read the limits attached to each finding.

Research update

Phoenix-area housing counts and shelter funding

Three source checks separate preservation from new construction, a project total from its financing portions, and funding authority from spending. Source passages checked November 10, 2026 (MST).

Published on the website .

Investor-reported renovation and affordable conversion

Phoenix Manor preserves 450 existing apartments

R4 Capital describes renovating and converting 450 existing Phoenix Manor apartments from market-rate to affordable senior housing. Count the 450 as preservation of existing apartments.

ScopePhoenix, Maricopa County · senior apartments at Phoenix Manor
Time periodProject and occupancy periods unverified

Occupancy, household outcomes and the timing and terms of affordability restrictions require separate evidence. The 450 apartments are existing stock.

Record identifiersPHX-WEB-028
Council agenda records the ground-lease financing structure

La Victoria Commons has 104 apartments in two financing portions

Tempe’s agenda identifies two 52-apartment portions. The proposed ground leases identify the 4% and 9% LIHTC portions separately. Together they account for 104 apartments. The 19 townhomes are a separate component.

ScopeTempe, Maricopa County · La Victoria Commons
Time periodApril 25, 2024 Council agenda; active financing period unverified

The 104 already includes both portions. Keep the townhomes separate from the apartment count. The financing record does not establish completed or occupied homes.

The April 25, 2024 agenda describes proposed ground leases. Executed leases, financing closing, construction completion and occupancy require separate evidence.

Record identifiersPHX-WEB-029
Adopted City funding authority and site dedication

Salvation Army family shelter expansion has up to $8 million in HOME-ARP authority

Phoenix replaced the original $6 million CDBG and CDBG-CV commitment with up to $6 million in HOME-ARP in 2023. Council added up to $2 million in 2025, bringing the HOME-ARP authority to $8 million. The City announced the site dedication on May 12, 2026.

ScopePhoenix District 8, Maricopa County · Salvation Army family shelter expansion
Time periodCouncil actions in 2023 and 2025; site dedication in 2026; active loan period unverified

The initial CDBG commitment was replaced and cannot be added again. Funding authority does not establish cash paid. The ceremony marked the site for future construction. Opening, expenditures and people served by the expansion remain unverified.

The December 3, 2025 Council report describes a $10 million total project cost and a loan. The May 12, 2026 City announcement describes an estimated $8 million project and a grant. The reviewed sources leave the differences unexplained. An executed agreement, any amendments and a reconciled budget are needed to establish the terms and cost.

Record identifiersPHX-WEB-030
November 9 research update

New findings, with their limits.

Published: . Phoenix and HOME sources checked . The HAMC notice carries its separate source-check date below. Other research keeps its original review dates.

Housing Authority of Maricopa County · Dated property-waitlist notice

Four Maricopa County Property Waitlists Will Close December 1

The Housing Authority of Maricopa County says it will stop accepting applications for four property waitlists at 8 a.m. Arizona time on December 1, 2026, until further notice.

The notice names Casa Bonitas Apartments, Clare Feldstadt Apartments in Mesa, Heritage at Surprise Apartments, and Heritage Senior Apartments in Surprise. Paper applications will not be accepted.

ScopeFour HAMC property waitlists, separate from City of Phoenix programs
Source datesOctober 2026 closure notice and November 5, 2026 waitlist schedule; checked November 9, 2026 Arizona time
Keep in mind. Property-specific application limits may apply earlier. Check HAMC’s latest schedule before applying. This notice does not guarantee an apartment or change the City of Phoenix’s housing programs.

The notice was located during the latest review; it was not newly issued.

Record identifiersMC-HAMC-WEB-001 · PHX-HAMC-001 and PHX-HAMC-002 · Application closure notice, not a vacancy or eligibility determination
Phoenix city · Draft FY2025–26 report · Unresolved wording

Phoenix: Rehabilitation Count Needs Clarification

Phoenix’s draft FY2025–26 performance report says “Thirty-three (37 CDBG and 0 CDBG-CV)” households received housing rehabilitation services. The correct count remains unclear.

A separate table reports 32 homeowner rehabilitations, but we haven’t established whether it covers the same activities.

ScopePhoenix city; draft narrative and separate annual outcome table
Time periodFY2025–26
Keep in mind. The wording inconsistency is unresolved. Do not choose 33 or 37 as the correct count or use the separate 32 to reconcile it. This discrepancy does not establish misuse of funds.
Record identifiersPHX-WEB-027 · Unresolved draft wording; no matched activity universe established
Maricopa County · PY2027–28 funding opportunities · Phoenix city excluded

Maricopa County: HOME Funding Opportunities

The County estimates $768,000 for HOME Urban County and $667,529 for Community Housing Development Organizations. Both competitions exclude the City of Phoenix. Applications are due December 8, 2026 at 5 p.m.

ScopeMaricopa County competitions; each packet has its own eligible service area
Time periodPY2027–28; applications due December 8, 2026
Keep in mind. These are estimates for competitive funding, not confirmed awards or spending. They are not City of Phoenix funds. Read each packet’s geographic and applicant eligibility rules before applying.
Record identifiersMC-HOME-WEB-001 · Two separate competitive funding estimates, not awards or expenditures
Full research, updates and methods
Start here / Phoenix research tools

Choose where to begin.

01 / What housing is delivered?

Reported housing results

A first set of project findings, not a complete production count. Draft reporting and existing inventory are presented separately.

556apartments across five reported completed projectsDRAFT FY2025–26 CAPER
Not all Phoenix housing production
Reported completed in draft FY2025–26 CAPER

Start with the reported projects.

Phoenix’s draft FY2025–26 CAPER reports completion of 25th @ Bell (53 apartments), Pueblo Apartments (161), Garfield II (60), Residences at Falcon Park (192) and Harmony at the Park III (90).

Record identifiersPHX-WEB-001 · Five distinct developments, not all Phoenix housing production
Reporting period: 2025-07-01 to 2026-06-30
Calculated from five draft CAPER project rows

The five developments total 556 apartments and 49 HOME-designated units as reported in the draft FY2025–26 CAPER.

A draft report is not a verified certificate of occupancy, fully occupied property or HUD acceptance. The public copy remained draft when checked.

ScopeFive reported completed projects only
Time periodFY2025–26
Keep in mind. 49 is the CAPER’s reported HOME designation total, not a verified count funded exclusively by Phoenix. Bell has separate City and State HUD activities. Do not add assisted units to total apartments.
Record identifiersPHX-WEB-002 · Calculated report subtotal
Go deeper / Project file

25th @ Bell

Follow one development through City and State HOME activities, dated ARPA statements and the questions still unresolved.

Open the project file
Published property directory; calculated phase total

Existing inventory, phase by phase.

Harmony at the Park has 325 apartments across three phases: 120 in Phase I, 115 in Phase II and 90 in Phase III.

Phase I120apartmentsPhase II115apartmentsPhase III90apartments
ScopeAll three physical Harmony phases
Time periodCity directory dated May 2026
Keep in mind. This is apartment inventory, not 325 newly completed apartments in FY2025–26.
Record identifiersPHX-WEB-004 · Published property directory; calculated phase total
02 / Projects & plans

Projects and plans

Phase boundaries matter. The project scope and the date of each progress report stay attached to the finding.

Planned development scope, not completed units

The Moreland: a two-phase plan.

The Moreland is planned as two phases totaling 237 apartments: 132 in Phase I and 105 in Phase II.

At the June 17, 2026 Council action, the staff report described Phase I as under construction and forecast completion in February 2028.

ScopeThe Moreland I and II, replacing the former Deck Park Vista development
Time periodJune 17, 2026 Council report
Keep in mind. An older accomplishments summary labels Phase I with 237; do not use 237 as completed Phase I units. The February 2028 forecast reflects the June 2026 report. Current construction status and actual completion remain unverified.
Record identifiersPHX-WEB-007 · Approved financing action describing development scope
Project file / The Moreland

Follow Phase I and Phase II separately.

Connect planned scope, financing stages, dates and the evidence still needed.

Open the Moreland project file →
Planned gross redevelopment units; not completed production

Girasol: redevelopment, with dated progress.

Girasol, the final Edison-Eastlake phase on the former 145-unit Sidney P. Osborn site, is planned for 364 apartments: 289 affordable and 75 market-rate.

ScopeThree Girasol subphases on the former Sidney P. Osborn site
Time periodProject card revised October 26, 2026
Keep in mind. 364 counts all planned newly constructed apartments, including redevelopment of existing housing capacity. It is not 364 net additions or 364 new affordable units. Exact legal replacement obligations are a separate measure.
Record identifiersPHX-WEB-020 · Official GO Bond project scope
Construction progress and forecasts as of October 26, 2026

The October 26, 2026 update reported Girasol Phase I construction 82% complete and Phase II 79% complete. It forecast their move-ins in early 2027, Phase III construction in Q1 2027 and Phase III move-ins in 2028.

Construction percentages are not occupied-unit counts. Planned future starts and move-ins must not be marked completed.
Record identifiersPHX-WEB-022 · Three Girasol subphases, not Harmony phases · 2026-10-26
03 / Where does the money go?

Housing funding records

These examples show financing stages. They do not establish a combined total of City spending.

Authorization ≠ paymentBond closing ≠ City expenditurePlanning award ≠ construction delivery
Read the records / Funding explainer

Why housing funding figures differ.

Public Housing Capital Fund examples show why published awards, formula calculations, City proposals and annual expenditure are not the same measure.

Read the Capital Fund explainer
Issuer-reported closed conduit financing; not City spending

A reported closing is not City spending.

Phoenix IDA reports $43.1 million of Moreland I financing closed in December 2025; the preceding Council approval allowed up to $50 million.

ScopeMoreland I Series 2025 notes
Time periodCouncil approval November 5, 2025; reported closing December 2025
Keep in mind. Do not add $50m and $43.1m. Neither amount is total City assistance, a HOME disbursement or audited final development cost.
Record identifiersPHX-WEB-009 · Issuance ceiling followed by reported financial closing
Authorization ceiling; mixed funding sources

An authorization is a ceiling.

On June 17, 2026, Council authorized up to $10 million from HOME, NSP and other affordable-housing funds, plus up to 54 project-based vouchers, for Moreland Phase II.

Scope105-unit Moreland II at 475 E. Moreland Street
Time period2026-06-17
Keep in mind. No fund split or executed agreement was verified. Do not label all $10m HOME, spent or paid; up to 54 is not a verified count of executed PBV contracts.
Record identifiersPHX-WEB-010 · Adopted Ordinance S-53026
HUD award announcement

Planning support is its own stage.

HUD’s FY2024 planning-grant summary identifies the City of Phoenix as grantee and a $500,000 award for Marcos de Niza–Grant Park. The Phoenix draft Annual Action Plan separately says planning began in calendar 2024.

HUD announced a $500,000 Choice Neighborhoods planning grant for Phoenix’s Marcos de Niza–Grant Park neighborhood in September 2024.

ScopePlanning and transformation-plan work
Time period2024-09-10
Keep in mind. This is a planning award, not an implementation construction award or proof of grant spending.
Record identifiersPHX-WEB-012 · HUD award announcement

FY2024 is the award fiscal year. Calendar 2024 is the draft plan’s stated planning-start year. Neither establishes the complete grant performance period.

HUD FY2024 grant summary · PDF page 5

Phoenix draft Annual Action Plan · PDF page 58 (printed page 56)

04 / Housing need

Housing need and context

Housing need requires its own evidence: rents, household incomes and affordability measures, with geography and survey period clearly identified.

ACS 2025 estimate · Phoenix city · renter-occupied homes paying cash rent

A dated rent baseline.

Phoenix city’s median gross monthly rent was estimated at $1,733 in the 2025 American Community Survey.

ScopePhoenix city, Arizona; renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent
Time period2025 ACS 1-year estimate; 2025 nominal dollars
Uncertainty. 90% margin of error: ±$36; 2025 nominal dollars. This is a survey estimate, not today’s asking rent. It is not a metro estimate.
Record identifiersPHX-WEB-026 · PHX-CITY-007
GEO_ID 1600000US0455000 · E001 / M001
05 / What still needs answers?

Open questions

These are research questions, not findings of wrongdoing. Missing records or unresolved differences alone do not establish misuse or noncompliance.

01

Which assisted apartments overlap?

Unit-level schedules are needed before combining designations from different funders at the same property.

02

When do affordability restrictions end?

Use executed restriction agreements, amendments and their start dates. Leave unverified end dates blank.

03

What was actually paid?

Match project-specific disbursement records to the funder, phase and period before calculating spending per apartment.

04

How do conflicting records get resolved?

Keep both dated sources visible until a correction, executed agreement or closeout record explains the difference.

06 / Sources & method

Sources and method

Each finding above links directly to its official source. This overview keeps Phoenix claim and source IDs separate from Tucson research.

Drafts stay labeled as drafts. Calculations stay attached to their inputs. Plans, inventory and reported delivery remain separate.

Selected Phoenix rehabilitation and Maricopa County HOME sources checked . Other findings retain their November 8 or earlier review dates.
This is a dated research snapshot, not a live monitoring feed.

Back to top ↑
  • HAMC four-property waitlist closure notice
    Source locator & notesPHX-HAMC-001 · Page 1: applications close December 1, 2026 at 8 a.m. Arizona time until further notice; paper applications not accepted. Not a City of Phoenix program notice.
  • HAMC November 5, 2026 waitlist schedule
    Source locator & notesPHX-HAMC-002 · Page 1: dated property-specific status and application limits; check current HAMC notices before applying. Not a guarantee of a vacancy or an open list until December 1.
  • Maricopa County HOME Urban County PY27–28 application packet
    Source locator & notesMC-HOME-001 · Estimate printed page 2 / PDF page 3; geography printed page 3 / PDF page 4; deadline on cover. Both competitions exclude Phoenix city. Estimated availability, not an award or expenditure. Checked November 9, 2026, 4:11 p.m. MST.
  • Maricopa County HOME-CHDO PY27–28 application packet
    Source locator & notesMC-HOME-002 · Estimate printed page 2 / PDF page 3; geography printed page 4 / PDF page 5; deadline on cover. Both competitions exclude Phoenix city. Estimated availability, not an award or expenditure. Checked November 9, 2026, 4:11 p.m. MST.
  • Draft FY2025–26 CAPER
    Source locator & notesPHX-CITY-002 · Draft report. Page 4 says “Thirty-three (37 CDBG and 0 CDBG-CV)”; page 6 separately reports 32 homeowner rehabilitations. Identical scope is not established. Selected passages checked November 9, 2026, 4:11 p.m. MST.
  • City annual reports index
    Source locator & notesPHX-FILING-001 · Public index; current documents remain draft-labeled
  • May 2026 City rental-site directory
    Source locator & notesPHX-EXT-PROJECT-017 · Published City rental-site directory, May 2026; addresses and inventory, not a restriction agreement
  • June 17, 2026 Moreland II Council report
    Source locator & notesPHX-EXT-PROJECT-002 · Adopted Council action; metadata in PHX-EXT-PROJECT-001. The Report Summary describes Phase I construction and the February 2028 forecast as of the June 17, 2026 action.
  • June 18, 2025 Moreland Council report
    Source locator & notesPHX-EXT-PROJECT-004 · Adopted Council action; metadata in PHX-EXT-PROJECT-001
  • Council adoption and action dates
    Source locator & notesPHX-EXT-PROJECT-001 · Council adoption status and action dates; development scope remains sourced to the separate staff texts.
  • October 2026 GO Bond status report
    Source locator & notesPHX-BOND-001 · Official quarterly administrative status report
  • FY2026–27 Annual Agency Plan
    Source locator & notesPHX-CITY-010 · City final-labeled plan; local AHGB approval verified; HUD approval not located
  • Phoenix IDA closed-bond schedule
    Source locator & notesPHX-EXT-PROJECT-114 · Official issuer publication; reported closing or meeting materials, not signed bond documents
  • November 5, 2025 Moreland I Council report
    Source locator & notesPHX-EXT-PROJECT-003 · Adopted Council action; metadata in PHX-EXT-PROJECT-001
  • HUD September 2024 planning awards
    Source locator & notesPHX-PROJECT-002 · Official award announcement
  • 2025 ACS median gross rent, table B25064
    Source locator & notesPHX-CITY-007 · Official Census estimate and margin of error · GEO_ID 1600000US0455000 · file row 1,888 including header
  • R4 Capital Phoenix Manor property profilePHX-R4-001 · The investor profile lists 450 senior apartments. The profile has no stated document date or reporting period. It supplies the property count without an occupancy or household outcome measure.
  • R4 Capital Phoenix Manor reopening statementPHX-R4-002 · The investor describes a renovated, formerly market-rate property with 450 apartments for seniors and cites LIHTC. The statement does not supply a verified absolute publication date, unit-level restrictions, or occupancy.
  • Tempe April 25, 2024 Council agendaPHX-TEMPE-001 · Items 8C5–8C7 identify proposed ground leases for two 52-apartment LIHTC portions and a separate 19-townhome component. The meeting date identifies the ground-lease proposal. Executed leases, financing closing, construction completion and occupancy require separate evidence.
  • Phoenix June 14, 2023 Council minutesPHX-SHELTER-001 · Pages 89–90, item 80. Adopted Ordinance S-49878 replaced the up-to-$6 million CDBG and CDBG-CV funding with HOME-ARP. The vote documents authority. Actual disbursement requires payment records.
  • Phoenix December 3, 2025 Council actionPHX-SHELTER-002 · Adopted Ordinance S-52469, File 25-2333, added up to $2 million and states a total City HOME-ARP commitment of $8 million. The staff report describes a $10 million total project cost and a loan. Actual expenditure and opening require separate evidence.
  • Phoenix May 12, 2026 shelter site dedication announcementPHX-SHELTER-003 · The City announcement describes a ceremony at the site of future construction on May 12, 2026. The ceremony documents a project milestone. The City describes an estimated $8 million project and a HOME-ARP grant. The opening date and people served by the expansion remain unverified.
  • HUD FY2024 Choice Neighborhoods planning-grant summariesPHX-PROJECT-003 · PDF page 5: Phoenix, Marcos de Niza–Grant Park, $500,000. Award fiscal year, not the complete performance period.
  • Maricopa County proposed 2025–2029 plan-amendment noticeMC-PLAN-001 · PDF page 1: proposed membership and goal changes, comment period and hearing. Adoption and implementation unverified.

Maricopa County proposes plan changes

Maricopa County · Proposed changes

Proposed amendment to the 2025–2029 Consolidated Plan

The County’s notice proposes Tempe leaving and Goodyear joining the HOME Consortium, and Buckeye leaving and Cave Creek joining the Urban County. It anticipates about 14% less HOME funding over three years and proposes reducing the HOME tenant-based rental-assistance goal from 650 to 500 households.

The notice proposes a $100,000 ESG outreach goal serving 150 people, with a $100,000 reduction in existing shelter operations and services goals. This is a proposed shift, not new net ESG funding.

Scope: Maricopa County HOME Consortium and Urban County. Proposed plan coverage: 2025–2029. Comment period: November 11–December 10, 2026. Hearing scheduled November 19, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. MST.

The notice describes proposed goals and anticipated funding effects. It does not establish adoption, actual grant reductions, spending or households assisted. Checked November 10, 2026 MST.

Proposed amendment notice · PDF page 1 · County notices and documents

MC-PLAN-WEB-001 · MC-PLAN-001